<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Dutch SEO</title>
	<link>http://www.dutchseo.com</link>
	<description>Sharing the experiences of a Dutch SEO</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/DutchSeo" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Spampress - Blog Spamming or Spam Blogging</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/234588666/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/spam/spampress-blog-spamming-or-spam-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DutchSEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/spam/spampress-blog-spamming-or-spam-blogging/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, I know I don&#8217;t blog a lot (talk about understatements) but this blog sure does receive a lot of comments. 2½ months of not looking at DutchSEO generated over 8000 spammy comments. That&#8217;s more than a hundred a day&#8230; Akismet handled the most of the comments, only a few actually made it to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I know I don&#8217;t blog a lot <em>(talk about understatements) </em>but this blog sure does receive a lot of comments. 2½ months of not looking at DutchSEO generated <strong>over 8000</strong> spammy comments. That&#8217;s more than a hundred a day&#8230; Akismet handled the most of the comments, only a few actually made it to the &#8216;live&#8217; web site. But still, obviously there&#8217;s a couple of people putting serious effort in <strong>blog spamming</strong>. <em>Is it that effective?</em></p>
<p>It probably is, there are hundred of thousands of Wordpress web sites that don&#8217;t have Akismet installed. I once won a casino-related SEO contest just by blog spamming millions of sites. I actually ended up taking <strong>8 of the first 10</strong> spots so yes, it&#8217;s really effective.</p>
<p>Earlier this week I was thinking of another way to use Wordpress as a <em>spam tool</em>. Re-writing Wordpress URL&#8217;s is relativily simple, how about re-writing every word/category to <strong>it&#8217;s own sub domain</strong>? With the use of a couple of RSS feeds you could generate thousands of sub domains in an instance. Re-using the feeds of your first spam blog you could generate a network of linked spam sites in a matter of minutes. It&#8217;s do-able, but what would be the impact?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you have the ability to use wild-card sub domains. Then all you need to do is get Wordpress to re-write internal links to <em>http://blog-post.category.example.com</em>. With a little more effort it could be even better: <em>http://silly.blog.post.category.example.com</em>. Feed each install a couple of thousand messages through RSS and you&#8217;d have the <strong>ultimate killing scraper</strong>. Re-feed the RSS messages from the first scraper into the second, aggregate the feeds from the first and the second in your thirth scraper and you have an entire network.</p>
<p>Sounds <strong>crazy</strong>, but it would work. Easy, actually. Who&#8217;s up for a little coding..?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/234588666" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/spam/spampress-blog-spamming-or-spam-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/spam/spampress-blog-spamming-or-spam-blogging/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>I own googleandroid.com :-)</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/190397224/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/i-own-googleandroidcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DutchSEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/general/i-own-googleandroidcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I was the first to try and register googleandroid.com, definitely not the last if I have to believe my stats. On the first day I owned the domain I had about 500 referrers from domain services like Domaintools, EuroDNS, Cypack, Instantdomainsearch, Domainfriend, United Domains and many more.
So how did I get it? Just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I was the first to try and register <a href="http://www.googleandroid.com">googleandroid.com</a>, definitely not the last if I have to believe my stats. On the first day I owned the domain I had about 500 referrers from domain services like Domaintools, EuroDNS, Cypack, Instantdomainsearch, Domainfriend, United Domains and many more.</p>
<p>So how did I get it? Just plain old luck I guess, even though Android was announced november 2 I didn&#8217;t register it untill the fifth.</p>
<p>I set up a small web site earlier today, now all I have to do is wait and hope for Google to brand Android and not one of the other members of the Open Handset Alliance (there are over 30, so it&#8217;s not just Google).</p>
<p><strong>Drupal 6</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.googleandroid.com">Google Android</a> is my first encounter with the latest  Drupal 6 (Beta 3). My first impression is that it has become easier to set up a site (the installation is a breeze). However, the menu module is still a bit of magic to me. Even though it has better core integration then previous versions.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/190397224" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/i-own-googleandroidcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/i-own-googleandroidcom/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Cutts asking for Google bugs</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/174906123/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/matt-cutts-asking-for-google-bugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DutchSEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/matt-cutts-asking-for-google-bugs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve probably read Matt&#8217;s post asking for Google bugs. Even though not really international I have found a couple.
First of all Google ignoring robots.txt files using a wildcard as user-agent. Netters (Dutch) posted about this earlier. Google indexed over 200k result pages of the @home search engine. Even though they&#8217;ve added the directory to their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve probably read Matt&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bugs-especially-international-bugs/">post asking for Google bugs</a>. Even though not really <em>international</em> I have found a couple.</p>
<p>First of all Google ignoring robots.txt files using a wildcard as user-agent. <a href="http://netters.nl/google-merkwaardigheden">Netters</a> (Dutch) posted about this earlier. Google indexed over 200k result pages of the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site:home.nl/zoeken/web">@home search engine</a>. Even though they&#8217;ve added the directory to their <a href="http://www.home.nl/robots.txt">robots.txt</a>. There&#8217;s plenty of other domains with the exact same behaviour.</p>
<p>Second is Google showing the same URL twice in their results. Take a search for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;q=new+york+hotels&amp;btnG=Search">new york hotels</a> for instance. <strong>Nycetourist.com</strong> is both on the first- (#2) and second (#11) page. Many other search queries show <em>(even multiple)</em> duplicate listings, too.</p>
<p>Offcourse, there&#8217;s a lot more buggy stuff going on but I&#8217;d like to keep things to myself for a while before I publicize it :-)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/174906123" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/matt-cutts-asking-for-google-bugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/matt-cutts-asking-for-google-bugs/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Google blocked my Adsense account</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/148411082/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/adsense/google-blocked-my-adsense-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DutchSEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Adsense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/adsense/google-blocked-my-adsense-account/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent the last two weeks in Hungary, sunny, warm, cheap and sh*tloads of fun. Cheap in this sentence being relative because when I returned back home I found out that Google blocked my Adsense account, leaving me with nothing but this short message:
An AdSense account does not exist for this login, as it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent the last two weeks in <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=hungary&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=46.739861,18.561401&amp;spn=2.721694,7.338867&amp;z=8&amp;om=1">Hungary</a>, sunny, warm, cheap and sh*tloads of fun. Cheap in this sentence being relative because when I returned back home I found out that Google blocked my Adsense account, leaving me with nothing but this short message:</p>
<blockquote><p>An AdSense account does not exist for this login, as it is associated with an unapproved application., search your email to find the disapproval or account closure message we sent you for more information.</p></blockquote>
<p>That sucks! Especially since this was my largest account (I have multiple) making a couple of thousand dollars each month. True, it was also the most shadiest of my accounts but still, it sucks&#8230;</p>
<p>I never received the mail Google referred to but luckily one of the Adsense account managers could quickly inform me that they will pay me the outstanding balance. Thank God &#8217;cause that was a couple of thousand dollars, too.</p>
<p><strong>Reveiling my Adsense tricks</strong><br />
Since I am moving towards a more &#8220;white hat&#8221; business model I am planning on stopping spam. For the Dutchies amongst you: I will be posting my Adsense tricks online in the next couple of weeks on <a href="http://netters.nl">Netters</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/148411082" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/adsense/google-blocked-my-adsense-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/adsense/google-blocked-my-adsense-account/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get traffic to your brand new blog</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/137333073/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/how-to-get-traffic-to-your-brand-new-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DutchSEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/how-to-get-traffic-to-your-brand-new-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Disclaimer: This blog has had only about 500 visitors since I started it last Saturday so you may want to consider if I am really the right person to listen to&#8230;
We all blog for certain reasons: to express ourselves, to share a passion or just to make money. Whatever your reasons may be, we all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.dutchseo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/rijen_bezoekers.jpg" alt="Visitors waiting in line for your blog" style="float: right" /></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Disclaimer</strong>: This blog has had only about 500 visitors since I started it last Saturday so you may want to consider if I am really the right person to listen to&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>We all blog for certain reasons: to express ourselves, to share a passion or just to make money. Whatever your reasons may be, we all blog to be heard. And for that you need an audience. In this post I&#8217;d like to show you how I got those 500 people to my blog, and what I am going to do to get even more.</p>
<p><strong>First step: Make your blog Search Engine Friendly</strong><br />
This is one you can&#8217;t do without. Once you&#8217;ve been up and running for a couple of weeks search engines (Google) are likely to deliver at least 50 percent of your website&#8217;s traffic. With most blog-software (like Wordpress, Textpattern or Expression Engine) search engine friendliness comes standard. All you need to do is turn on those pretty URLs and you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p><strong>Second step: Feed synchronization</strong><br />
If your blog is up and running the next step is to submit your RSS (or Atom) feed to services like <a href="http://technorati.com">Technorati</a> and <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/ping">Google blogsearch</a>. There are many other services but personally I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re worth the effort. Eventually you may want to consider adding an <a href="http://www.sitemaps.org/">XML-sitemap</a> to your website.</p>
<p><strong>Third step: Directory submission</strong><br />
Whatever you may have heart, directories can still be valuable. Don&#8217;t expect tons of traffic but do it mostly for the backlinks, those links eventually make you rank in Google. Every now and then you might stumble upon a directory that actually sends you visitors <em>(a <a href="http://www.feedroll.com/dir/">friend&#8217;s directory</a> sent me 25 visitors today)</em>. You can submit your site to all those directories by hand but it&#8217;s a lot faster to use a <a href="http://www.123promotion.co.uk/directorymanager/">submission service</a>.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t submit your site to DMOZ or the Yahoo directory (yet). Changes are very slim that they&#8217;ll list a new site. It&#8217;s better to wait a couple of months, create a lot of valuable content in the meantime, and not to upset the editor.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth step: Use social media sites</strong><br />
There are plenty of so-called &#8220;Social Media Sites&#8221; like <a href="http://digg.com">Digg</a> and <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/">Stumble upon</a>. Write a great article, submit it to these social media sites and have a couple of friends vote for your article. If you make it to one of the front pages it&#8217;ll get you tons of traffic. If not, write a better article and try it again ;-)</p>
<p><strong>Fifth step: Reply to other blogs</strong><br />
There are probably hundreds <em>(if not thousands)</em> of other blogs about the same topic which you can find through services like Technorati. Let them know you exist by replying to their posts (with your link). Try to actually write meaningful replies, the chance of someone clicking your link are a lot bigger if they are triggered by your reply. Don&#8217;t care to much if a blog adds &#8220;nofollow&#8221; to a link, if your reply was good enough the author might link to you in future postings.</p>
<p><strong>Sixth step: Appear as &#8220;guest author&#8221;</strong><br />
The best way to build a name is to write for blogs that have more readers then yours. You can either ask up front or just send them an article. Don&#8217;t worry if they don&#8217;t post it, you can always use it for your own blog.</p>
<p><strong>Seventh step: Ask for links</strong><br />
Once your somewhat of an established author it becomes easier to just ask for links to your website. Send them an e-mail and see what happens, if they want a link back you can always add their site to your &#8220;blogroll&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Eight step: Submit your site to DMOZ &amp; Yahoo</strong><br />
Be the time you reach this step you have probably built a well read, quality content weblog. If you have then now is the time to submit your site to <a href="http://www.dmoz.org">DMOZ</a> and the <a href="http://dir.yahoo.com">Yahoo directory</a>. Search the directories to find the best suited, well edited category. Don&#8217;t sweat it if it takes a while, DMOZ can take up to six months to get you listed. Be patient, you will get there eventually&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/137333073" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/how-to-get-traffic-to-your-brand-new-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/how-to-get-traffic-to-your-brand-new-blog/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stay in control of your feeds with Feedburner Mybrand</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/136920793/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/stay-in-control-of-your-feeds-with-feedburner-mybrand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DutchSEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/general/stay-in-control-of-your-feeds-with-feedburner-mybrand/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve never really used Feedburner, played with it a for a while about a year ago but never actually switched. The main reason was that I wanted to stay in control of my feeds and not give them away to some third party.
Up until now I have been tracking feedreaders with self built add-ons for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.dutchseo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/feeburner.gif" alt="Feedburner logo" style="float: right" />I&#8217;ve never really used Feedburner, played with it a for a while about a year ago but never actually switched. The main reason was that I wanted to stay in control of my feeds and not give them away to some third party.</p>
<p>Up until now I have been tracking feedreaders with self built add-ons for <a href="http://www.stuffedguys.com/products/tracker/">Stuffed Tracker</a>. It works but it gets noway near the slick stats Feedburner provides you with. So for <a href="http://www.dutchseo.com">DutchSEO</a> I decided to give Feedburner another go.</p>
<p>Looking around a little in the admin area I saw &#8220;<a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/publishers/mybrand">Mybrand</a>&#8220;. And that&#8217;s exactly what I always wanted, to be able to publish my feeds on my domain, and have users subscribe to my feeds on my domain. All you need to do is add a CNAME record pointing at Feedburner and you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p><code>feeds CNAME feeds.feedburner.com</code></p>
<p>That&#8217;s all, that&#8217;s brilliant, <em>that&#8217;s something they should have done ages ago&#8230;</em></p>
<p>And if I ever decide to drop Feedburner I can just change the Vhost and redirect the subdomain to anywhere I want.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/136920793" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/stay-in-control-of-your-feeds-with-feedburner-mybrand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/stay-in-control-of-your-feeds-with-feedburner-mybrand/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why using “www” might not be such a bad idea</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/136857703/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/why-using-www-might-not-such-a-bad-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DutchSEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/general/why-using-www-might-not-such-a-bad-idea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re a tech-nerd like me you already knew this, www is deprecated. To cite no-www.org:
By default, all popular Web browsers assume the HTTP protocol. In doing so, the software prepends the &#8216;http://&#8217; onto the requested URL and automatically connect to the HTTP server on port 80. Why then do many servers require their websites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.dutchseo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/www.jpg" alt="To WWW or not to WWW" style="float: right" />If you&#8217;re a tech-nerd like me you already knew this, www is deprecated. To cite <a href="http://no-www.org">no-www.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>By default, all popular Web browsers assume the HTTP protocol. In doing so, the software prepends the &#8216;http://&#8217; onto the requested URL and automatically connect to the HTTP server on port 80. Why then do many servers require their websites to communicate through the www subdomain? Mail servers do not require you to send emails to recipient@mail.domain.com. Likewise, web servers should allow access to their pages though the main domain unless a particular subdomain is required.</p></blockquote>
<p>It does sound stupid doesn&#8217;t it? Buy a domain to only use a subdomain. But is it really? The painfull truth is that most people are stupid <em>(or ignorant for that matter)</em>&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been testing a little with a couple of my &#8220;no-www&#8221; domains and apparantly <em>approximately 20% of all natural homepage links</em> point to www.domain.com. even though it&#8217;s redirected to the non-www equivalent. That leaves us with one question: <em>are redirected links less valuable then direct links?</em></p>
<p>I believe they are, Google <em>(and most large search engines for that matter)</em> keep so called &#8220;link profiles&#8221; containing data like age of a link, target page and much more. It does look like the value of these link-profiles isn&#8217;t transferred, even if there&#8217;s a <strong>301 permanent redirect</strong>. I know for a fact that Yahoo doesn&#8217;t (I have a domain ranking top 10 for a very competitive keyword, even though it&#8217;s been redirected for over 9 months).</p>
<p>So the next time you launch a new website you may want to consider using it anyway, even though it looks less cool&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Update with example</strong><br />
Take <a href="http://cssmania.com">CssMania</a> for example (the first one I found after publishing this post). Sure, they have over 50k links pointing to <em>http://cssmania.com</em> but another 10k+ pointing to <em>http://www.cssmania.com</em>. That&#8217;s one in five.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/136857703" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/why-using-www-might-not-such-a-bad-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/why-using-www-might-not-such-a-bad-idea/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Creating a search-based content scraper</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/136857704/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/spam/creating-a-search-based-content-scraper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DutchSEO</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MFA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/spam/creating-a-search-based-content-scraper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re on of those people building MFA-sites you probably know what a pain in the ass it can be to write &#8220;quality content&#8221;. And since it&#8217;s just made for Adsense you can just as well scrape some pages instead of actually writing them&#8230;
There are basically three options to get your scraped content:

Ripping of entire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.dutchseo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/knife-scraper.jpg" alt="Scraper you did’t expect" style="float: right" />If you&#8217;re on of those people building MFA-sites you probably know what a pain in the ass it can be to write &#8220;quality content&#8221;. And since it&#8217;s just made for Adsense you can just as well scrape some pages instead of actually writing them&#8230;</p>
<p>There are basically three options to get your scraped content:</p>
<ul>
<li>Ripping of entire pages</li>
<li>Scraping RSS feeds</li>
<li>Scraping SERP pages</li>
</ul>
<p>My favorite is scraping SERP pages, this will get you guaranteed relevant pages with a nice keyword-density. To demonstrate how you can do this I modified the <a href="http://www.google-script.com">Google script</a>. For the search results I use <a href="http://xml.mihalismsearch.com/protocol.php">Mihalismsearch&#8217;s XML feeds</a> (unlimited queries!).</p>
<p>I hacked all the irrelevant stuff out of the Google script (demo: <a href="http://www.dutchseo.com/xmlsearch/?query=Dutch+SEO">Dutch SEO</a>) leaving just a SERP page with nice titles and heading. If you&#8217;re planning on using it yourself you may wanna consider hacking out the links as well.</p>
<p>Next up: URL rewriting. The URLs you really want for your scraper are someting <a href="http://www.dutchseo.com/xmlsearch/Dutch+SEO.html">like this</a>. Just add the following code to your .htaccess:</p>
<p><code>RewriteEngine On<br />
RewriteRule ^([^/]+)\.html$ /xmlsearch/?query=$1 [L]</code></p>
<p>Now you&#8217;re pretty much done except for a nice &#8220;little&#8221; keywordlist. I prefer Keyword Elite or Google&#8217;s Keyword Suggestion Tool. Create links to the scraped content pages and you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>Ah, before I forget. You can download the <a href="http://www.dutchseo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/xmlsearch.zip" title="XML scraper">demo package here</a> offcourse.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/136857704" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/spam/creating-a-search-based-content-scraper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/spam/creating-a-search-based-content-scraper/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Posting to the SeoMoz UGC section</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/136857705/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/posting-to-the-seomoz-ugc-section/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/general/posting-to-the-seomoz-ugc-section/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of days ago I posted an article to the SEOmoz UGC section, &#8220;Stealing DMOZ-listings with Mod_Proxy&#8220;. It was more or less a test to see how much traffic a link from SEOmoz would bring in. The article got listed early yesterday morning and has since, believe it or not, brought me 3 visitors&#8230;
That&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.dutchseo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/seomoz.png" alt="SEOMOZ Logo" style="float: right" />A couple of days ago I posted an article to the SEOmoz UGC section, <em>&#8220;<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/stealing-dmoz-listings-with-mod-proxy" title="Article in the SEOMOZ UGC section">Stealing DMOZ-listings with Mod_Proxy</a>&#8220;. </em>It was more or less a test to see how much traffic a link from SEOmoz would bring in. The article got listed early yesterday morning and has since, believe it or not, brought me 3 visitors&#8230;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s somewhat disappointing. True, it wasn&#8217;t a very prominent link and the article wasn&#8217;t the best I&#8217;ve ever written but still. With an Alexa traffic of nearly 1,000 and 317 feedreaders according to Feedburner (just the YouMoz section) I&#8217;d expected a little more. I&#8217;ll probably try again somewhere next week, maybe a &#8220;White Hat&#8221; style article attracts more attention.</p>
<p>Besides SEOmoz <a href="http://sphinn.com">Sphinn</a> might be worth a shot. Most articles hit the frontpage with 10+ votes, which sounds pretty doable. Other than that I have to re-start networking. Since it&#8217;s in English now my usual network is pretty much useless. I feel so &#8220;nude&#8221; with only 25 people having visited this blog :-&#8217;(</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/136857705" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/posting-to-the-seomoz-ugc-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/general/posting-to-the-seomoz-ugc-section/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why being a Dutch SEO is different</title>
		<link>http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~3/136857706/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/why-being-a-dutch-seo-is-different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/why-being-a-dutch-seo-is-different/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization in the Netherlands is definitely different from SEO in the US or the UK. First of all there is offcourse the language. A search engine determines the language of a webpage mainly on the links to, and from, other webpages. This can easily become a problem If you link out a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.dutchseo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/flag-netherlands.png" alt="Flag of The Netherlands" style="float: right" /><em>Search Engine Optimization</em> in the Netherlands is definitely different from SEO in the US or the UK. First of all there is offcourse the language. A search engine determines the language of a webpage mainly on the links to, and from, other webpages. This can easily become a problem If you link out a lot to <em>(or gain links from)</em> English sites, before you know it the search engine thinks that your site is in English causing bad rankings in your local language.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s marketshare, talking about search engines over here means talking about Google. Google has a <strong>whopping 96 percent marketshare</strong>. Yahoo is pretty much non-existent and MSN/Live is only used by kids and people who don&#8217;t know how to change Vista&#8217;s default search engine. There are a couple of other, local engines but I don&#8217;t know any SEO paying attention to them.</p>
<p>Another issue is Belgium, about half of the Belgians speak Dutch and thus making it an interesting audience. But ranking in the Netherlands doesn&#8217;t mean ranking in Belgium as well&#8230; That said, because of the Dutch&#8217; international orientation a lot of Dutch people search for English terms. So you&#8217;re pretty much obligated to handle a multi-country/language strategy.</p>
<p>Ranking for competitive search terms in the Netherlands is a lot easier. Even though more then 80% of the Dutch population uses the internet there&#8217;s still only about 17 million of us. And accordingly a lot less webpages to compete with.</p>
<p>But most of all being a Dutch SEO is fun. Because of our experience in local optimization and our international orientation we not only get to work with Dutch, German, French, Polish and Spanish clients, but many US clients as well. To me it almost feels like having the best of both worlds :-)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.dutchseo.com/~r/DutchSeo/~4/136857706" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/why-being-a-dutch-seo-is-different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.dutchseo.com/seo/why-being-a-dutch-seo-is-different/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
